Friday, December 15, 2006
Shorter title
I'm trying to think of a shorter title for this blog. If you can help with any ideas, email me! (Or, you know, just comment).
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Getting scarier in Gaza
The situation in Palestine is getting scarier (if this is possible). The prime minister, or head of the PNA "government," Ismail Haniyeh, is declaring that the shots fired at his limousine were an assassination attempt.
The context for this is that Haniyeh had gone on a visit abroad and was attempting to return to the open-air prison in Gaza with some money for food and salaries to alleviate the misery that continues to increase in the territories. Haniyeh had to leave about $30m in Egypt and eventually, after diplomatic negotiations, was allowed to return. But hey, humiliating the head of "government" is always an acceptable step.
The PNA should have been dissolved long ago, when Abbas could still make the decision himself to end the charade and return responsibility to Israel. If your "government" is arrested by its supposed negotiating "partner," then what sort of "government" is it and what does it "govern"? The Israelis still have all the cards and, like true Likudniks, treat the Palestinians elected as the elected representatives of the prisoners (sorry, "Arabs of Eretz Israel"). But now, Hamas and Fatah cannot agree on anything, and neither will concede for fear of giving the other some sort of edge; and even if they did, other groups make the situation impossible.
As for the horrible situation in the Territories, this can be credited almost entirely to Israel as the power broker. The Palestinian track, if such a thing exists, no longer has anything to do with diplomacy; it is entirely about Israeli domestic politics. Peretz and Olmert jockey for who gets to talk to Abbas or other Palestinians (who hasn't met them in person since the election, but is forced to receive lower ranking Israeli diplomats). Israel's refusal to negotiate or concede any points, and its policies in the Territories, were largely responsible for Hamas's election victory (along with its attempts to subvert Fatah and make it a dependent puppet); and now the boycott and the checkpoints, and the closure of Gaza to almost any traffic, are sealing the deal.
So Israel, as Danny Rubinstein opines in Ha'aretz, will probably have a full-scale Palestinian civil war on its hands soon. If they are hoping the Palestinians will horribly weaken themselves again, they may well be correct, but the fallout won't be pleasant, and the Palestinians won't go away.
What could be done about this? A circumvention of the boycott to pay civil servants through roundabout means, including U.S. funds; release of Palestinian tax funds stolen by the Israeli government to serve this purpose; an alleviation of the unnecessary WB checkpoints; extension of the Gaza "ceasefire" to the WB; an immediate halt to outposts and dismantling of some; resumption of negotiations and diplomatic overtures to Abbas; encouragement of a Palestinian unity government; reopening of the Gaza-Karni and Gaza-Rafah checkpoints to allow agricultural export, movement between Gaza and Egypt and products to move between GS and WB.
What will be done about this? None of the above. At some point, the Israeli government may decide to kill or arrest someone else, to show that they can.
The context for this is that Haniyeh had gone on a visit abroad and was attempting to return to the open-air prison in Gaza with some money for food and salaries to alleviate the misery that continues to increase in the territories. Haniyeh had to leave about $30m in Egypt and eventually, after diplomatic negotiations, was allowed to return. But hey, humiliating the head of "government" is always an acceptable step.
The PNA should have been dissolved long ago, when Abbas could still make the decision himself to end the charade and return responsibility to Israel. If your "government" is arrested by its supposed negotiating "partner," then what sort of "government" is it and what does it "govern"? The Israelis still have all the cards and, like true Likudniks, treat the Palestinians elected as the elected representatives of the prisoners (sorry, "Arabs of Eretz Israel"). But now, Hamas and Fatah cannot agree on anything, and neither will concede for fear of giving the other some sort of edge; and even if they did, other groups make the situation impossible.
As for the horrible situation in the Territories, this can be credited almost entirely to Israel as the power broker. The Palestinian track, if such a thing exists, no longer has anything to do with diplomacy; it is entirely about Israeli domestic politics. Peretz and Olmert jockey for who gets to talk to Abbas or other Palestinians (who hasn't met them in person since the election, but is forced to receive lower ranking Israeli diplomats). Israel's refusal to negotiate or concede any points, and its policies in the Territories, were largely responsible for Hamas's election victory (along with its attempts to subvert Fatah and make it a dependent puppet); and now the boycott and the checkpoints, and the closure of Gaza to almost any traffic, are sealing the deal.
So Israel, as Danny Rubinstein opines in Ha'aretz, will probably have a full-scale Palestinian civil war on its hands soon. If they are hoping the Palestinians will horribly weaken themselves again, they may well be correct, but the fallout won't be pleasant, and the Palestinians won't go away.
What could be done about this? A circumvention of the boycott to pay civil servants through roundabout means, including U.S. funds; release of Palestinian tax funds stolen by the Israeli government to serve this purpose; an alleviation of the unnecessary WB checkpoints; extension of the Gaza "ceasefire" to the WB; an immediate halt to outposts and dismantling of some; resumption of negotiations and diplomatic overtures to Abbas; encouragement of a Palestinian unity government; reopening of the Gaza-Karni and Gaza-Rafah checkpoints to allow agricultural export, movement between Gaza and Egypt and products to move between GS and WB.
What will be done about this? None of the above. At some point, the Israeli government may decide to kill or arrest someone else, to show that they can.
The Belgiumization of Belgium
If you were Belgian, it would probably scare you (or make you happy, one of the two) to turn on the TV and hear that your country no longer existed.
Belgian public broadcaster RTBF ran an on-air spoof for almost two hours, claiming that Flanders had declared independence. Their reason, they said: to provoke debate about the current state of the nation's affairs.
Belgium is, kind of, an example of successful federalism--it's a federal state with six federal entities, three of them regions and three of them cultural communities, which overlap. "Kind of" successful because the system keeps changing to accommodate additional demands, and Flemish nationalists in particular (Vlaams Belang) continue to perform well at elections. When I studied in Granada, Spain, my European politics professor spent two classes going over just the Belgian federal system. In part this emphasis was because most of my classmates were (1) not polisci majors and (2) didn't speak Spanish as well as I did, but I did learn a decent amount about how Belgium is ridiculously complex.
While we in the U.S. might immediately know that a news report that the South had seceded again was fiction, in Belgium, you can't be sure--hence, the alarm and controversy surrounding the broadcast decision.
Belgian public broadcaster RTBF ran an on-air spoof for almost two hours, claiming that Flanders had declared independence. Their reason, they said: to provoke debate about the current state of the nation's affairs.
Belgium is, kind of, an example of successful federalism--it's a federal state with six federal entities, three of them regions and three of them cultural communities, which overlap. "Kind of" successful because the system keeps changing to accommodate additional demands, and Flemish nationalists in particular (Vlaams Belang) continue to perform well at elections. When I studied in Granada, Spain, my European politics professor spent two classes going over just the Belgian federal system. In part this emphasis was because most of my classmates were (1) not polisci majors and (2) didn't speak Spanish as well as I did, but I did learn a decent amount about how Belgium is ridiculously complex.
While we in the U.S. might immediately know that a news report that the South had seceded again was fiction, in Belgium, you can't be sure--hence, the alarm and controversy surrounding the broadcast decision.
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Brace yourself
I'm almost done for the holidays. Be prepared for the onslaught of posts to follow...
Another part of the gay agenda, revealed
Wondering why your kid is gay? Here's the explanation.
Next time, let his mother eat the tofu herself.
(Via PoliBlog)
Next time, let his mother eat the tofu herself.
(Via PoliBlog)
Monday, December 11, 2006
The #17 university in the world?
Not that I like to criticize my own university, in general, but...
As I was updating my blogger profile I decided to include a tongue-in-cheek reference to the Jiao Tong university rankings of global institutions. The top 20 include such recognized centers of learning as Harvard (1), Cambridge [UK] (2), Stanford (3), UC-Berkeley (4!), and... the University of Wisconsin at Madison (16) and the University of Washington (17)??? Umm, are we talking about the same UW here? Apparently it is ahead of Michigan, NYU and Northwestern.
This becomes somewhat more logical when you see that the rankings are basically based on the volume of publishing by faculty and prizes won. By sheer size, UW has an advantage there, being a larger-sized institution than most, and some of the faculty are pretty good. However, the rankings have almost nothing to do with the student experience. Admittedly, universities aren't made just for students; but students play a vital role in them. And from my young perspective, there is no way the University of Washington is #17 in the world...
An interesting note about the survey is that pretty much all the top schools are American. This, and the way the rankings are made, is just another citation for the fact that American schools are much better at facilitating research than European ones.
As I was updating my blogger profile I decided to include a tongue-in-cheek reference to the Jiao Tong university rankings of global institutions. The top 20 include such recognized centers of learning as Harvard (1), Cambridge [UK] (2), Stanford (3), UC-Berkeley (4!), and... the University of Wisconsin at Madison (16) and the University of Washington (17)??? Umm, are we talking about the same UW here? Apparently it is ahead of Michigan, NYU and Northwestern.
This becomes somewhat more logical when you see that the rankings are basically based on the volume of publishing by faculty and prizes won. By sheer size, UW has an advantage there, being a larger-sized institution than most, and some of the faculty are pretty good. However, the rankings have almost nothing to do with the student experience. Admittedly, universities aren't made just for students; but students play a vital role in them. And from my young perspective, there is no way the University of Washington is #17 in the world...
An interesting note about the survey is that pretty much all the top schools are American. This, and the way the rankings are made, is just another citation for the fact that American schools are much better at facilitating research than European ones.
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Pinochet dies
General Augusto Pinochet has died at the age of 91. I believe the initial reaction from the UK foreign office was appropriate:
Margaret Thatcher has apparently said she is "greatly saddened." That saddens me.
Según La Tercera, un 55 por ciento de chilenos opinan que Pinochet no debiera recibir honores de ex presidente en el funeral. (According to the Chilean newspaper La Tercera, 55% of Chileans believe Pinochet should not be buried with the honors of an ex-president).
We note the passing of Gen Pinochet and want to pay tribute to the remarkable progress that Chile has made over the last 15 years as an open, stable and prosperous democracy.
Margaret Thatcher has apparently said she is "greatly saddened." That saddens me.
Según La Tercera, un 55 por ciento de chilenos opinan que Pinochet no debiera recibir honores de ex presidente en el funeral.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)